Publish or Pay: Investigating High APCs in Scopus and Web of Science Journals

Authors

  • Prof. Dr. S. Balasubramanian Chief Editor and Managing Director, IAEME Publication Pvt Limited, Chennai, India. Author

Keywords:

Article Processing Charges (APC), Open Access Publishing, Scopus Journals, Web of Science Journals, Scholarly Publishing, Research Publication, Publication Fees, Academic Publishing, Journal Ranking, Diamond Open Access

Abstract

Article Processing Charges (APCs) have become a significant aspect of scholarly publishing, particularly in Open Access journals indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. While Open Access publishing improves the visibility, accessibility, and dissemination of research findings, the increasing APCs imposed by many journals have raised concerns among researchers, especially those from developing countries and institutions with limited research funding. This study investigates the prevalence of high APCs in Scopus and Web of Science-indexed journals and explores the factors contributing to these publication costs. Data were collected from journal ranking databases and publisher websites to examine APC variations across disciplines, publishers, and journal quality indicators. The analysis reveals that APCs differ substantially among journals, with prestigious and high-impact journals generally charging higher fees. The findings suggest that publication costs are influenced by factors such as journal reputation, publisher policies, editorial management, peer-review processes, and Open Access business models. Furthermore, the study highlights the financial challenges faced by researchers and identifies alternative publishing options, including low-cost and Diamond Open Access journals. The research concludes that although APCs support publishing operations and wider access to scientific knowledge, excessive publication fees may create barriers to equitable participation in academic publishing. Greater transparency in APC pricing and increased support for affordable publishing models are recommended to promote inclusivity and accessibility in scholarly communication.

References

[1] Alencar, B. N., & Barbosa, M. C. (2021). Open access publications with article processing charge (APC) payment: A Brazilian scenario analysis. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 93(4).

[2] Appel, A. L., & Albagli, S. (2019). The adoption of article processing charges as a business model by Brazilian open access journals. Transinformação, 31, e190045.

[3] Beasley, G. (2016). Article processing charges: A new route to open access? Information Services & Use, 36(3–4), 163–170.

[4] Björk, B. C., & Solomon, D. (2014). Developing an effective market for open access article processing charges.

[5] Borrego, Á. (2023). Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review. Learned Publishing, 36(4), 651–665.

[6] Budzinski, O., Grebel, T., Wolling, J., & Zhang, X. (2020). Drivers of article processing charges in open access. Scientometrics, 124(3), 2185–2206.

[7] Butler, L. A., Matthias, L., Simard, M. A., et al. (2023). The oligopoly's shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(4), 778–799.

[8] Halevi, G., & Walsh, S. (2021). Faculty attitudes towards article processing charges for open access articles. Publishing Research Quarterly, 37(3), 384–398.

[9] Jain, V. K., Iyengar, K. P., & Vaishya, R. (2021). Article processing charge may be a barrier to publishing. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 15, 218–219.

[10] Klebel, T., & Ross-Hellauer, T. (2023). The APC-barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(1), 22–43.

[11] Morrison, H., Salhab, J., Calvé-Genest, A., & Horava, T. (2015). Open access article processing charges: DOAJ survey May 2014. Publications, 3(1), 1–16.

[12] Nwagwu, W. E. (2023). Nature and characteristics of global attention to research on article processing charges. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(6).

[13] Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Orr, R., et al. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375.

[14] Smith, M. K., Anderson, I., Björk, B. C., McCabe, M., et al. (2016). Pay it forward: Investigating a sustainable model of open access article processing charges for large North American research institutions.

[15] Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B. C. (2012). A study of open access journals using article processing charges. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1485–1495.

[16] Solomon, D., & Björk, B. C. (2016). Article processing charges for open access publication—The situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada. PeerJ, 4, e2264.

[17] Suber, P. (2012). Open Access. MIT Press.

[18] Tennant, J. P., Crane, H., Crick, T., et al. (2019). Ten hot topics around scholarly publishing. Publications, 7(2), 34.

[19] White, R. K. A., Angelo, A., Fitchett, D., Fraser, M., et al. (2021). Only two out of five articles by New Zealand researchers are free-to-access: A multiple API study of access, citations, cost of APCs and open access patterns. PeerJ, 9, e11417.

[20] Zhang, L., Wei, Y., Huang, Y., & Sivertsen, G. (2022). Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research. Scientometrics, 127(12), 7653–7677.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-05

How to Cite

Publish or Pay: Investigating High APCs in Scopus and Web of Science Journals. (2026). International Journal of Computing Science and Systems (IJCSS), 7(1), 57–71. https://ijcss.com/index.php/about/article/view/IJCSS_0701008